Teenager Jake Chambers (Tom Taylor) is psychologically disturbed by the death of his father and by his dreams of another world where a Man in Black (Matthew McConaughey) and his minions are trying to destroy a tower that holds the universe together and are opposed by the last gunslinger (Idris Elba). After some mind-numbing family drama, Jakes finds a magic portal and travels to the world of Roland The Gunslinger, who has grown bitter. Jakeâs dreams are a indication that he has the âshiningâ (yeah, like in the movie The Shining), and so is both the magic boy the Man in Black needs to destroy the tower and the key to the gunslingerâs victory.
Based on Stephen Kingâs elaborate gunslinger series, The Dark Tower is not an adaptation, since the filmmakers claim (after the fact) that it is a sequel to the books. Well, that at least makes discussions of the books irrelevant, which is to the movieâs advantage as no fan of the books is going to have anything nice to say about this movie.
Since theyâd thrown out the books, there is no reason for Jake to be in The Dark Tower (something the PR department picked up on as he is absent from advertising) except that young adult movies areâor wereâvery popular. This is the story of a gunslinger verses the Devil; everything with Jake is unnecessary, and worse, uninteresting. While it might be relevant in the books that children are magical batteries, it is a plot point that needed to have been dropped. With super-battery-kid as the lead, Roland, the powerful gunslinger out for revenge, is reduced to a bland babysitter for a generic magic child. Neither he nor the kid can support a film.
McConaughey does better as the Man in Black (also known as Walter). Heâs a sleazy kind of evil that is entertaining and deserves a better film. His techno-magic hints at a more appealing universe that we are never shown.
The Dark Towerisnât interesting enough to be a disaster. Its failing is in lack of imagination. It doesnât try to be much of anything and in that it succeeds.
Stewart had a more varied career than most actors and far more than most leading men of the golden age. He not only was in, but was known for, comedies, dramas, melodramas, family films, romances, thrillers, and Westerns. Early in his career, he was in a string of sentimental Frank Capra movies, with Itâs A Wonderful Life being the most famous. Iâm not a fan of these as they tend to go over the top with shmaltz, letting both real human interaction and humor die for the sake of sentimentality. The worst offender is You Can’t Take It with You, a wonderful play that is gutted by Capra. Luckily, Stewart had other moments, with strong turns in comedies before becoming one of Hitchcockâs two favorites (Cary Grant being the other).
Stewartâs performances were unusual too. He pushed the edges, and his brilliant performances were often one twitch away from a ham mess. When he held it just right, he was a master at frustration, anger, hatred, and loss. When he let it go too farâŠ
Honorable mentions go to Vivacious Lady (1938)âa romantic comedy with Ginger Rogers, Destry Rides Again (1939)âa comedy western with Marlene Dietrich, Call Northside 777 (1948)âa detective crime drama, and The Man Who Shot Liberty Valance(1962)âa western with John Wayne and Lee Marvin.
And for the best:
8 – The Mortal Storm (1940) â The movie that upset the Nazis; Hollywood finally took a stand on what had been going on in Europe. Stewart plays the friend of a ânon-Aryanâ family during the rise of the Nazi party in Germany.
7 – Bell Book and Candle(1958) â This should be on everyoneâs Halloween viewing list, or Christmas. Stewart is a bit gray for his starring role in a supernatural romantic comedy, but Kim Novak is breathtaking as a powerful, sexy witch and Ernie Kovacs, Else Lanchester, and Jack Lemmon are all marvelous. [Also on the Jack Lemmon list]
6 – Vertigo(1958) â A second Hitchcock film, this one even more over-hyped than the last having replaced Citizen Kaneas the greatest movie of all time according to Sight and Sound. Itâs still a good flick, with Stewart as an obsessed and troubled man. While it is shot as a thriller, it is really a character drama.
5 – Rear Window (1954) â A Hitchcock thriller seeped in voyeurism. Itâs become hip to love it in recent years, but don’t let that dissuade you. It is a nicely tense work.
4 – Anatomy of a Murder (1959) â A courtroom drama that questions our prejudices. Stewart attempts to defend an unpleasant and violent defendant with a promiscuous wife from a murder everyone would be happy to hang on him.
3 – Harvey(1950) â A happy man with a giant invisible rabbit as his best friend upsets his uptight family. This may be Stewartâs best performance. It is certainly his most unusual.
2 – After the Thin Man (1936) â Stewart plays third banana to William Powell and Myrna Loy. Taking place soon after The Thin Man, Nick and Nora are summoned by Noraâs snobbish family because a husband is missing. The relationship material is wonderful, the humor is spot on, and the mystery is engaging. [Also on the Myrna Loy list and the William Powell list]
1 – The Philadelphia Story (1940) â This is the essential romcom, and was the perfect vehicle for its three leads, Stewart, Cary Grant, and Katherine Hepburn. None of them ever had a role that more completely played to their strengths. This is as witty as film gets. [Also on the Katherine Hepburn list and the Cary Grant list]
Some lists are hard. Some are easy. And some are pretty much repeats. This one is a repeat.
Crosby was primarily a pop/swing/jazz singer. He parlayed that into success in film and TV, but it was always music first. He had enough charismaâand his own staff of writersâto become a solid comedian. His best films were his collaborations with Bob Hope and Dorothy Lamour: the seven Road pictures. They were loose comedies with a few songs and a lot of patter, which was perfect for Crosby.
His most famous non-musical role was as Father Chuck OâMalley in Going My Way and its slightly superior sequel, The Bells of St. Maryâs. They are reasonably enjoyable in an overly-sweet, simplistic way, but far from the classics they were once thought to be. So what are Crosbyâs classics? Iâve got them below, right after this Honorable mention: Road to Rio (1947) which is the one really good Road picture not on the list below.
8 – Robin and the 7 Hoods (1964) â The best of the Rat Pack (Frank Sinatra, Dean Martin, Sammy Davis Jr.) films, with Crosby taking over Peter Lawfordâs part in the group.
7 – Road to Bali(1952) â The 6th of 7 Road pictures, Bali is a return to form as Hope and Crosby go to the South Seas, and toss off a non-stop string of one-liners while breaking the 4th wall. Itâs wacky and fun. (Full Review) [Also on the Bob Hope list]
6 – Road to Zanzibar (1941) â The 2nd Road picture has Hope, Crosby, and Lamour spoofing (or just inhabiting) a jungle picture. It is one of the less wild outings, with the 4th wall unbroken. (Full Review) [Also on the Bob Hope list]
5 – Road to Utopia (1945) â The Road pictures were at full steam here as our three are in Alaska during the gold rush, but all that matters are jokes. (Full Review) [Also on the Bob Hope list]
4 – White Christmas (1954) â Is there a better icon of the light, colorful, and joyfully shallow side to Christmas than this bright and shiny musical? Obviously I think not. (Full Review)
3 – Road to Singapore (1940) â The first Road picture with Hope and Crosby playing characters and sticking with a plot. Dorthy Lamour is an Island fantasy, which was her gig at the time. Itâs the only Road picture where you might care about something other than the jokes. (Full Review) [Also on the Bob Hope list]
2 – Holiday Inn (1942) â Fred Astaire gets to play the bad guy, messing up Crosbyâs love life. This is a perfect holiday movie for pretty much every holiday as it has songs for New Years, Valentineâs Day, Easter, the 4th of July, and Washingtonâs Birthday, though the black face Lincolnâs Birthday number might be a hard sell. It also includes the song âWhite Christmasâ and it was from this filmâs re-recorded sound track that it became a hit. [Also on the Fred Astaire list]
1 – Road to Morocco(1942) â Ah, where to start. Many people claim this is the funniest movie of all time and I wouldnât argue that. It is absurd, with no concern about the rules of filmmaking. Hope and Crosby talk to the audience, they refer to the last film and their contracts, and its all brilliant. Even the songs are good for a change. (Full Review) [Also on the Bob Hope list]
Nathaniel Shepherdâs (Gary Oldman) space company sends the first colonists to Mars in 2018 [maybe not the best year to choose for a movie made in 2017]. After takeoff, the mission commander is found to be pregnant. She gives birth on Mars and promptly dies. Shepherd decides to keep the baby a secret to preserve the companyâs reputation. Sixteen years later, the now teen Gardner (Asa Butterfield) gets an OK to go to Earth. Once there, he escapes from quarantine and finds Tulsa (Britt Robertson), the âtoughâ girl heâd chatted with online. The two go in search of his unknown father, with Shepherd and mother-surrogate astronaut Kendra Wyndham (Carla Gugino) in pursuit.
This is what gives young adult SF a bad name.
Also, this is what gives commercial space ventures a bad name. The film is an unintentional argument against corporations running a space program as they might act like this.
The weakness of the science in this âscience fictionâ film is a minor thing, but itâs hard for me to ignore. Somethings are simply wrong, such as instantaneous communication with Mars. Others stretch credibility beyond breaking, such as missing a second-or-so trimester pregnancy in an astronautâs physical exams. And a few need explanation, such as how they fed a newborn on Mars. And best not to think about how the filmmakers think gravity works.
When we arenât with the twenty-plus-year-old teens, we are with an over-acting Oldman, who expresses all emotions by banging his fists, crying out to the sky, and pacing. It does have the odd effect of making the teens look reasonable.
The Space Between Us hits a few of the requisite emotional beats. A majority of the characters arenât annoying and the film is passably made. Thereâs no reason to see it, but no reason to avoid it either. If you are a tween girl, add a reel.
With his no-nonsense, manâs man persona and natural style, Spencer Tracy was successful in both dramas and comedies. Although he was an alcoholic, he was known for his professionalism. It was with that understanding of addiction that he helped a broken Montgomery Clift give his great performance in Judgment at Nuremberg.
Tracy often worked with director Stanley Kramer, mostly on the powerful, political/ethical films that Kramer was known for. He frequently co-stared with Katherine Hepburn (their semi-secret affair lasted nearly thirty years), making nine films together.
Before mentioning the good, I’d feel lax if I didnât give a dishonorable mention to Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde (1941), where his poor performance matched the films confused sexuality and drab dialog.
An Honorable mention goes to Guess Who’s Coming to Dinner (1963), which is more important than good, and to It’s a Mad Mad Mad Mad World(1963), which is fun if not terribly good, and to Boys Town (1938), which works for a family film provided you have a couple kids under ten watching.
Now the eight best:
8 – Thirty Seconds Over Tokyo (1944) â A wartime propaganda film that is both exciting and supposedly accurate, at least militarily.
7 – Pat and Mike (1952) â The second Hepburn/Tracy film, it tries to wave a feminist flag, but in 2017, it feels like it does the opposite. Still, it has some funny moments. [Also on the Katherine Hepburn list]
6 – Bad Day at Black Rock (1955) â A strange noir/western hybrid set in 1945. Itâs tense, showing the worst of humanityâincluding a nod at racismâin a nowhere town of miserable people. Itâs a little too nihilistic to be fun, but itâs interesting.
5 – Adam’s Rib(1949) â Another Hepburn/Tracy film, this one setting them as competing lawyers. The best bits come from a young Judy Holliday as the defendant who shoots her unfaithful husband. [Also on the Katherine Hepburn list]
4 – Judgment at Nuremberg (1961) â The first of two Stanley Kramer films on this list (of four if you count the Honorable mentions). This one deals with a trial of Nazi war criminals and has lost none of its relevancy.
3 – Desk Set (1957) â A romantic comedy with middle-aged characters for a change. Itâs Hepburn and Tracy again. This time sheâs a genius and heâs an eccentric tech guru. Itâs a Christmas movie and delightful. [Also on the Katherine Hepburn list]
2 – Libeled Lady (1936) â A four-way romantic comedy with Tracy, Jean Harlow, William Powell, and Myrna Loy. Powell is hired by Tracy to stop Loy from suing a newspaper for libel, any way he can. [Also on both the William Powell list and the Myrna Loy list]
1 – Inherit the Wind (1960) – The second Stanley Kramer film on this list. A fictitious take on the Monkey Trial, with amazing work by Tracy and Fredric Marsh in the greatest court battle ever on screen.
Thor (Chris Hemsworth) is captured by Valkyrie (Tessa Thompson) on a gladiatorial planet ruled over by the Grandmaster (Jeff Goldblum). In order to win his freedom, he must fight the champion, the Hulk (Mark Ruffalo). And he must escape quickly as back on Asgard, his sister, Hela-Godess of Death (Cate Blanchett), has taken over, with only the trepidatious Skurge (Karl Ubran) at her side, and she plans a bloody conquest of the universe.
Marvel canât fail. At least for their theatrical films, it seems they can do no wrong. Every one of the now seventeen MCU films is a winner and in this case, Iâm sure not tired of the winning. And this one wins big. It is the brightest, fastest paced entry. Itâs one of the best, and for pure joy, it is the best
Thor: Ragnarok is unusual in a franchise that, more and more, is allowing itself a bit of freedom. The biggest difference is the editing. There is no wasted time. There are no pauses for you (or the characters) to dwell on things, or pout, or gaze off at nothing particular (making this THE anti-Bats v Supes film). There are no travelogues. Thor says weâre going to Earth, and we are immediately on Earth. Hela hears a summons in the throne room, and she is immediately in the throne room. This allows for a great deal of story in two hours. If Ragnarok was cut like other MCU films, it would be four hour long. If it was cut like your typical indie drama, it would be around ten. This has lead some to say that it isnât an emotional a movie, but thatâs wrong. It has the emotional beats; it just doesnât lay there, sinking slowly into them. It squeezes as much emotionâand as much action and humor and meaning and plot and sheer funâas possible into two hours.
The difference with Ragnarokthat everyone notices is that it is a comedy. That doesnât put it too outside the norm as it is standing close to Guardians of the Galaxy in tone. But this is the first time that Iâd call an MCU movie a comedy first, and an action picture second. The humor alone is enough to make this a great time, but the jokes serve the characters as well. Thor has always been pompous, both as a character and as how he is presented. He speaks like heâs a stand-in at a Renaissance faire and heâs accompanied by dramatic music. His arc has been that of an ass, who was completely full of himself, learning humility. But he only learned so much. Thor: Ragnarok takes him down several pegs. Time after time, as he tries to show how awesome he is (or where the previous films would have focused on his power and majesty), heâs tripped, zapped, and made to look like a fool. Itâs hysterical, and does a great job of taking him further in his arc.
Director Taika Waititi, known for his indie comedies, pushed the actors to improvise, and has said that 80% of the end dialog was invented while filming. Itâs no surprise that Tom Hiddleston is a riot or that Jeff Goldblum is a good time doing basically the Jeff Goldblum shtick. Iâm a bit surprised how funny Cate Blanchett can be. But the revelation is Chris Hemsworth. Sure, heâs had some good light moments before, but now Iâm ready for the Hemsworth Standup Comedy Tour.
So Thor: Ragnarok is funny. But doesnât that leave it wanting in action and drama and power? Nope, because after âcomedyâ the word Iâd use to describe this film is âMETAL.â And I donât mean hair METAL or even Metallica METAL. Iâm talking Dethklok METAL. This is the most METAL movie ever made. Ground zero is Led Zeppelinâs Immigrant Songâpresent in the trailers, but far more powerful in the film. The phrase âHammer of the Godsâ is used literally. Ragnarok then adds the imagery from a metal-head’s dreams. This is gods and monsters and trolls and devils. Shot after shot could be pulled for an â80s album cover. This is head-banging, devil-horn signaling METAL. That means that this is epic in a beautifully over-the-top fashion and isnât embarrassed about it. The battles arenât introspective narratives; they are heroic poems of mystic legends. The genius of Ragnarokis its ability to weave the self-deprecating comedy with a larger than life, legendary saga.
And I havenât mentioned half of the reasons to see this film: Mark Ruffalo and Hulk give you everything youâve ever wanted from the green rage monster. Tessa Thompson brings a sorely needed powerful female hero into the MCU with the hard-drinking Valkyrie. Benedict Cumberbatchâs long cameo as Doctor Strange is better than the entire Doctor Strange movie (and leads me to believe that perhaps the Sorcerer Supreme is best used in a supporting role). Anthony Hopkins makes Odin his most sympathetic. Taika Waititi put himself into the film, doing the voice of Korg, the rock gladiator; he is a full clown character that elicited roars of laughter from the audience. Only Idris Elbaâs Heimdall doesnât give us anything interesting or fun, but I suppose someone had to make sure the plot moved along.
Karl Urbanâs Skurge demonstrates how brilliantly crafted this film is. He doesnât get that much screen time, yet he has a meaningful and satisfying arc. In only minutes, he becomes a wholly realized character, and one I will remember.
Thor: Ragnarok even has thematic elements dealing with the past and how that creates personal and cultural identity, sometimes for the good, sometimes not, but it can never be ignored. So yes, this is a smarter film than most reviews realize, but Iâll agree with others that depth isn’t what captured me: Itâs comedy and METAL. Thor: Ragnarok is a great addition to the MCU and the best film Iâve seen this year.
(Thor: Ragnarok Trailer, but see the film first–the trailer(s) give away too much)
On a paradise planet, the members of the species known as Pearl live perfect lives until Armageddon comes from the skies. Thirty years later, agents Valerian (Dane DeHaan) and Laureline (Cara Delevingne) are sent to the Alpha Stationâwhere millions of creatures from many species interactâand assigned to guard suspicious-acting Commander Filitt (Clive Owen). A radioactive zone has appeared on the station and no one sent to investigate it has returned. If the zone continues to expand unchecked, it could kill everyone on the station. But Commander Filitt knows more than he is telling, and somehow this is related to the genocide of the Pearl. Before Valerian and Laureline can solve the mystery, they will encounter Jolly the Pimp (Ethan Hawke) and shape-shifting Bubble (Rihanna).
And then Dane DeHaan opens his mouth and it all goes to Hell.
Story-wise, what we have is a 1930s-era colonialist adventure. And that makes sense when looking at the comic, where Valerian is a square-jawed, time-traveling, by-the-book agent, and Laureline is an 11th century peasant girl. Her desires are a bit old fashioned, and he is a good natured chauvinist who learns a lesson over the course of the story. Thatâs how the script is written, but thatâs not how it is played out. My guess is that Besson is not an actorâs director, simply letting the actors do what they do. So Clive Owen plays his part as heâs played multiple others before, and its fitting. Rihanna essentially is in a music video, dancing around a pole and changing outfits. And Ethen Hawke slips into his zany mode. That works. But DeHaan has no knowledge of â30s adventure flicks, or of parodies of those, so just gives us the same modernist (for 2017), smart-ass, weaselly character he took on in The Amazing Spider-Man 2 and A Cure For Wellness, which is wrong for this film. It makes every line either non-nonsensical, uncomfortable, or just out of place. Valerian says he always follows the rules, but DeHaanâs performance says otherwise. Valerian repeatedly tells Laureline to stay back in dangerous situations in what is clearly meant to show his over-protective nature, but DeHann plays it in some weird, arrogant, misogynist mode. Every scene where he speaks is unpleasant.
Cara Delevingne (Enchantress in Suicide Squad) is miscast as well, as her part required an older actress with a stronger presence, but she could have been passable with a different lead. And a re-write of all the dialogâwhich is simplistic and uninspiredâwould have helped, but the difference between the disaster Valerian and the City of a Thousand Planets is, and the pleasing spectacle it could have been is DeHaan. With a mans-man, tough guy actor, weâd have ended up with that somewhat sexist â30s film. For this century, a far better choice would have been to play up the silliness of that square-jawed hero. Paul Iutzi suggested Patrick Warburtonâmaybe a ten-year-younger Patrick Warburton; he would have been perfect. Those same lines coming from him, as the wide-shouldered, heart-of-gold, rule-following, socially-backward, a bit ridiculous hero would have elevated the film from pleasing to great, and reversed the sexism. Or Chris Hemsworth, just repeating Thor, would have done the trick. But we got DeHaan, who looks too young, lacks the physical attributes, but most importantly, didnât understand the character.
Watching Valerian and the City of a Thousand Planetsmade me angry. It is a wasted opportunity. Watch the opening scene, and then the next few minutes of CGI wonder on the Pearl planet, once someone posts that online, but as for the rest of the film: Skip it.
A group of teens, each defined by one attribute (the Jewish one, the fat one, the black one, the girl, etc.), who are bullied and have terrible parents, are set upon by an evil clown (Bill SkarsgÄrd).
Based on the Stephen King novel of the same name, It removes the half of the bookâthe weird âcosmicâ parts (no doubt saved for the sequel) as well as the infamous teen gang-bangâleaving some kids verses an evil clown. It is well filmed, with a reasonable level of tension. The kids are not realistic in myriad ways (and shift from being quite cowardly to insanely brave from scene to scene pretty much randomly), nor are the parents, and many decisions donât make much sense, but the acting of these questionable characters is good.
This is a well-made film. It just isnât about much. There’s no explanation for anything (that was in the removed sections). Itâs abused kids vs evil clown. Thatâs it. If you are thinking, âI would like to see some teens beaten up,â then this movie has a lot of moments for you. If you like teens fighting an evil clown, then again, you are in luck. The clown isnât actually scary, or interesting, with a particularly bland voice; shouldnât an evil clown have a dramatic or intense voice? But it is an evil clown, if you like that sort of thing.
Are you getting the point? There is no meat here. I almost feel I should put a spoiler warning around the phrase, âteens verses evil clownâ because that tells you the entire film. There is nothing else, so donât come looking. Yes, I could dig into additional details, and no doubt other reviewers have, but why? Thereâs nothing else. Nothing else matters.
If youâve already watched Killer Klowns From Outer Space and House of 1000 Corpsesand feel you need one more evil clown feature before bedtime, It will do. Otherwise, thereâs no point.
I think of Rex Harrison as one of the great actors, yet âgreatâ is not a word I use with his most famous films. Doctor Dolittle, Anna and the King of Siam, The Agony and the Ecstasy, The Yellow Rolls-Royce, and Cleopatraare all fine, watchable flicks, but no masterpieces, and I normally donât even call them good without some kind of qualification. (My Fair Lady is a level up, but I still qualify any compliments I give it.)
Not that he isnât in some great filmsâor I wouldnât be making a list for himâsimply that they tend to be less known. His finest films are indeed great works in need of viewing.
The top 8:
8 – The Constant Husband (1955) – By the writing/directing/producing team of Sidney Gilliat and Frank Launder, which is always a good thing. Harrison is an amnesiac who finds that he may not have been a kindly guy.
7 – My Fair Lady (1964) – Audrey Hepburn is lovely. Harrison is fun. And the music is wonderful. It suffers from dubbing and the same flaw as the Broadway musicalâthe tacked on and in every way wrong âhappy ending.â [Also on the Audrey Hepburn list]
6 – Storm in a Teacup (1937) – A political satire, that seems to be about a small affair being blown out of proportion, but is a look at how fascism works and needs to be fought. A brilliant film with a sadly weak ending.
5 – Unfaithfully Yours (1948) – A dark comedy by Preston Sturges, who made a career out of not fitting Hollywood expectations. This one has Harrison daydreaming how to kill his assumed-to-be unfaithful wife.
4 – Night Train to Munich (1940) – A WWII spy thriller set in the world of The Lady Vanishes. It leans more on fun than tension.
3 – Major Barbara (1941) – Harrison in another film based on a Shaw play, with a co-star who was in the movie of Pygmalion. A thoughtful movie, with a few moments which work better on stage.
1 – The Ghost and Mrs. Muir (1947) – A widow, escaping her in-laws, rents a sea-side cottage that is haunted by a sea captain. Itâs charming and a bit sad.
I expect big fans of Robinson (and I wonder how many of those are reading this) will be displeased with my top 8 as it doesnât include either of the Fritz Lang Noirs, The Woman in the Window and Scarlet Street. Both have great casts, good dialog, interesting characters, meaningful themes, and generally good plots. But both are unsatisfying due to poor (and in the case of the first, horrible) endings. The production code-sanctified ending for Scarlet Street saps the strength from the film. And the ending for The Woman in the Window⊠It takes effort to so efficiently destroy a film in only a few minutes.
An honorable mention for his cameo in Robin and the 7 Hoods (1964)âgood enough to make the list, but I require more than a few seconds of screen time.
8 – The Sea Wolf(1941) – As 8th favorite I’d go with Brother Orchid, but The Sea Wolf is a more weighty film, that takes Jack London’s philosophical work and uses it as metaphor for the fascism taking over Europe.
7 – Little Caesar (1931) – A good film, but it is so over the top, so over-acted, that it is impossible for me to take seriously. Still, it is a must-see as one of THE gangster movies of the 1930s.
6 – The Amazing Dr. Clitterhouse (1938) – Robinson stars with Bogart with a script by John Huston in a light comedy that has Robinson playing a scientist who wants to study crime, so becomes a crime lord.
5 – Larceny, Inc. (1942) – The second crime comedy on this list, but this one is less crime, more comedy. Robinson and his gang take over a luggage store in order to tunnel into the bank next door and turn out way more successful than planned at selling luggage.
4 – Key Largo (1948) – A movie given extra power from its casting. Robinson plays a washed up gangster, trying to return. Bogart is a man broken by life and Lauren Bacall is the young, clever beauty who could give him a reason to live. It’s incredibly meta. The best performance goes to Claire Tevor as the aging, alcoholic moll. [Also on the Humphrey Bogart List]
3 – The Ten Commandments (1956) – It is all loud and colorful, and for that you need actors who are louder and more colorful than life. Robinson fits that. He’s 5th or 6th banana in a cast of loud, colorful stars and it’s all good. Sometimes you want subtlety. Sometimes you don’t. This is bluster as art. [Also on both the Vincent Price List and the Charlton Heston list]
2 – Double Indemnity (1944) – A masterpiece. One of the top Film Noirs and a strangely comedic bit of pure cynicism. Fred MacMurry and Barbara Stanwyck are the stars, but Robinson is superb as the closest thing the world of Double Indemnityhas to a good man. (Full review) [Also on the Barbara Stanwyck list]
1 – Soylent Green (1973) – A film where the ending has eclipsed the fame of the movie in general, and thatâs sad as thereâs so much good in Soylent Green. The relationship between Charlton Hestonâs Thorn and Robinsonâs Sol is the heart of the film, and gives us both actorsâ finest performances. This is one of the great science fiction films that doesnât get the credit it deserves. [Also on the Charlton Heston list]
The 4th of the Big Three horror icons (of sound films), like Karloff before him, Vincent Price had a liquid-jeweled voice and range. Priceâs early work was more often in Film Noirs, comedies, and a few adventure films. Except for brief sojourns, he didnât switch to horror until 1953âs House of Wax, but once there, he was stuck for life. The shame wasnât that he spent decades only able to make horror pictures, but that they were never A pictures. Still, he made many enjoyable B films and seemed happy.
Before the Best list, a few more honorable mentions than normal: An Honorable Mention for Abbott and Costello Meet Frankenstein (1948)âhis part is too small to consider the film for his list. Then an honorable mention to The Invisible Man Returns (1940), which lacks in story, but Price talking to the scarecrow was a fantastic moment. Also an Honorable mention goes to His Kind of Woman (1951), which overall doesnât quite work, but Price is wonderful in it. And a shout out to Witchfinder General (1968), which would be #9 below.
Finally, a group Honorable mention to a whole line of B horror films that are a lot of fun and a touch silly, including: House of Wax (1953), The Mad Magician (1954), House on Haunted Hill (1959), The Tingler (1959), The Diary of a Madman (1963), The Haunted Palace (1963), The Raven (1963), The Oblong Box (1969), and Theater of Blood (1973)
Which brings me to his best 8 films:
8 – The Last Man on Earth (1964) – The first and most accurate version of the novel âI Am Legend,â about a lone man fighting a world filled with vampires. Price and the theme makes this a must see.
7 – Tower of London (1939) – A horror-tinged version of the story of Richard III. Price is in a supporting role as the peevish Duke of Clarence who ends up on the wrong side of Basil Rathbone’s Richard and Boris Karloff’s Mord. (My Review) [Also on the Boris Karloff List]
6 – The Fly (1958) – THE mad scientist film of the â50s. Unlike the remake, this isnât a monster movie, but a tragedy. The main character isnât the genus inventor nor his brother (Price), but the none-too-clever wife. Her emotional strain is beautifully played. (My Review)
5 – The Masque of the Red Death (1964) – I donât normally connect Roger Corman with deep themes but then he never made another film like this. Itâs surreal and epic. Price is an evil prince who thinks Satan will protect him from Death.
4 – Champagne for Caesar (1950) – The hardest to find film on this list. In this zany comedy, Ronald Colman plays a brilliant man who decides to bankrupt an arrogant businessman by winning a quiz show. Price is the businessman. [Also on the Ronald Colman list]
3 – The Abominable Dr. Phibes (1971) – There arenât enough art-deco horror films. And there are few that are anywhere near this witty. Itâs elegant and violent with Price as a deranged musician out for revenge.
2 – The Ten Commandments (1956) – There are thoughtful and spiritual religious films. This isnât one. This is the Bible via Lord of the Rings and Mad Max. And Price is capable of bombast with the best of them. (My Review) [Also on both the Edward G. Robinson list and the Charlton Heston list]
1 – Laura (1944) – And as with Lugosi, this horror iconâs best film isnât horror. It is one of the great Film Noirs, with Price as a playboy gigolo. (My Critique)
As he has so many films that are worth seeing, but not absolutely essential, I have a greater number of honorable mentions than usual. One goes to the enjoyable The Raven (1963), and another to the incredible set design for The Black Cat (1934), and yet another to The Ghoul (1933), the first British horror film; itâs a solid old dark house film and Karloff is excellent. Also an honorable mention to Scarface(1932), which is an important film, but flawedâand Karloff is poor in it. And one more for The Mask of Fu Manchu (1932), which has multiple problems, but Karloff and Myrna Loy are amazing, and if “best” meant “favorite,” it would be on the list below. And a final mention for Five Star Final (1931), a look at the evils of yellow journalism starring Edward G. Robinson. Karloff plays a drunken and particularly sleazy agent of the paper who dresses as a priest to get information, which makes him not only the best supporting actor for that year (from #2 below), but also the second best.
A list of Karloffâs best performances would include his marvelous narration for How the Grinch Stole Christmas, a film which would take third on the list below, but I’m keeping it off the list for entirely arbitrary reasons. Karloffâs best list is solid all the way through, but it is top heavy.
His top films, starting at #8:
8 – Isle of the Dead (1945) – One of three collaborations with Val Lewton. A complicated character piece with a simple plot: a plague sweeping an island.
7 –Â The Old Dark House (1932) – A quirky filmâpart horror, part comedy, but not a horror comedy, directed by James Whale. A group of odd characters are stranded in a mysterious house. (My review)
6 –Â The Mummy (1932) – A retread of Draculaâa bit slow, but Karloff is wonderful as his second great monster. The first few minutes make it all worthwhile. (My review)
5 – Tower of London (1931) – A horror-tinged version of the story of Richard III. Karloff plays Mord,the executioner, who is Richard’s right hand man. and is essentially Richard’s darker aspect taken human form. It is another fantastic performance by Karloff, as well as star Basil Rathbone and a young Vincent Price. (My Review) [Also on the Vincent Price List]
4 – The Body Snatcher (1945) – There are more Victorian body snatcher movies than there were Victorian body snatchers, and this is the best. Karloff rules the film, with Bela Lugosi in a lesser part as a servant. [Also on the Bela Lugosi List]
3 – Son of Frankenstein (1939) – A surprisingly good third entry in the franchise. It is seeped in German expressionism. Karloff gets a reduced role; Basil Rathbone is the lead, but Lugosi steals the film as Ygor. (My review) [Also on the Bela Lugosi List]
2 –Â Frankenstein (1931) – Does Frankensteinneed an explanation? (My Review)
1 –Â Bride of Frankenstein (1935) – Arguably the greatest horror film of all time, and the greatest sequel of all time. It is (without argument) Karloffâs best performance. (My review)